Category Archives: Rubrics

Rubrics

ZOOM MEETING 09.09.2024

Posted on by vetwebquest
ZOOM MEETING 09.09.2024
12
Sep

ZOOM MEETING On 9 September 2024 the Project Coordinator Vocational School “N.Y. Vaptsarov” organized ZOOM meeting with the project partner organizations Neotalentway and Mobility Friends. The purpose of the meeting was to check how far the members have come in the implementation of the Activity “Development of Web Quests”. The results of the meeting showed […]

Continue reading →
Rubrics

EVENT – “Web Quests in VET classroom”

Posted on by vetwebquest
EVENT - "Web Quests in VET classroom"
30
Aug

From June 3 to 5, the Workshop “Web Quests in VET classroom” was held in Granada, Spain, in which representatives of the project’s partner organizations – Mobility friends, Neotalentway S.L and PGSST “Nikola Y.Vaptsarov” took part. The kind hosts of the meeting were Neotalentway S.L, who created an excellent organization of the event and its […]

Continue reading →
Rubrics

SAMPLE WEBQUEST ACHIEVEMENT ASSESSMENT TABLE

Posted on by vetwebquest
Criteria Points Categories 1 point Unsatisfactory 2 points Sufficient 3 points Good 4 points Very good Understanding the task Unsatisfactory performance. Uses a limited number of sources Includes both material that is directly related to the topic and material that is not related to the topic Includes material directly related to the topic The job demonstrates an accurate understanding of the task Technical Dictionary Inadequate use of technical terms, lack of specialized vocabulary or major errors Uses technical vocabulary in a limited and often inadequate manner. Common errors Correct use of technical. Minimum errors. Technical vocabulary used in an exemplary manner. Correct understanding of special terms used. Organisation, coherence Inadequate organization of information, with little or no attention to clarity and logic. Parts of the materials are clearly and logically organized Most of the material segments are clearly and logically organized. All materials and information are logically and clearly organized and presented. Creativity The student simply copies information from the suggested sources Lacks a critical view of the problem; the work has little to do with the topic of web search One perspective on the problem is demonstrated; comparisons are made but no conclusions are drawn Presents different approaches to the solution of the problem. The work has a strong personality and expresses the view of the microgroup Accuracy More than 2 days late 1-2 days delay Several hours late On Time Teamwork Showing little responsibility and almost no autonomy; Problems working with other group members, Unhelpful interaction with group members. There is responsibility and a degree of autonomy; good collaboration with group members and respect for others' views. Demonstrate responsibility and independence; very good collaboration with group members with respect for others' perspectives. Results were as expected Encourage collaboration between group members and present with explanations of your points of view. Seamless interaction with all group members. Demonstrate initiative. Scientific attributes of information Inadequate use of scientific information. Many empirical concepts Insufficient use of scientific concepts. Low understanding of concepts. Well used scientific information. Demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts Sample use of scientific concepts. Demonstrates a superior understanding of the concepts used Applied attributes of information Theoretical information without proven applied attributes Theoretical aspects combined with applied. Proven high degree of relevance of information Adequate combination between theoretical and practical aspects of information Graphical representation Poor and inadequate graphical representation Just some attractive graphical presentation features Attractive graphical presentation. Very attractive graphic presentation, adequate to the topic Use of materials and information Materials, information, data taken from other sources without real information Small real aspects Information, materials, ideas, bearing very real characteristics Materials, information, ideas proving original and presented in an original way Knowledge Choosing information that is not very relevant, from obscure sources. Presented insufficient knowledge, vaguely and without substantial knowledge. Presenting a relatively small amount of acquired knowledge. Selecting information from sources that are not too clear and applying some of it to the topic. Present much of the knowledge gained on the job clearly and understandably. Selecting relevant information from reliable sources. Present the acquired knowledge clearly, systematically and correctly. Using correct and relevant information from a variety of highly reliable sources with successful adaptation to the topic. Points
30
Aug

                 Criteria                        Points Categories 1 point Unsatisfactory 2 points Sufficient   3 points Good   4 points Very good   Understanding the task Unsatisfactory performance. Uses a limited number of sources Includes both material that is directly related to the topic and material that is not related to the topic Includes material directly related […]

Continue reading →
Rubrics

Embracing Diversity in Education: Understanding WebQuest Taskonomy

Posted on by vetwebquest
Embracing Diversity in Education: Understanding WebQuest Taskonomy
21
Jul

In today’s educational landscape, there is a growing emphasis on making learning more engaging, interactive, and effective. One innovative approach gaining popularity is the use of WebQuests. These are online-based tasks designed to encourage students to explore, analyze, and create information on various topics. At the core of this method is the concept of WebQuest […]

Continue reading →